Heart Failure: The Dilemma of the 40-50% Ejection Fraction Range

Michael Henein, Krister Lindmark, Andrew Coats, Per Lindqvist

Abstract


The common pathophysiology contributing to fluid retention and dyspnoea in heart failure is a non-compliant and stiff myocardium with raised left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. With the rapid development of newer imaging technologies, particularly echocardiography, our understanding of the syndrome of heart failure has significantly changed. The most important imaging sign in the early eighties was reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with low values being used as an explanation for the development of signs and symptoms.  In the early 2000s, similar Doppler echocardiographic signs became frequently recognised in patients with heart failure symptoms and signs who proved to have  a relatively maintained ejection fraction (EF) of >40%, hence the description of the syndrome of “diastolic heart failure”.  This was later rephrased as heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFnEF) and more recently as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Since then, HFpEF has attracted the interest of many cardiologists and scientists worldwide, searching for specific features and treatment options for the syndrome. As for the features, two important findings have now been established, the first showed that LV systolic function mainly at the subendocardial level was abnormal in HFpEF, particularly manifesting during stress/exercise when the increase in heart rate was not associated with a commensurate increase in stroke volume and a second observation of a significant impairment of left atrial function (i.e. myocardial strain) and emptying fraction associated with increased left atrial pressures and the potential development of atrial arrhythmia in HFpEF. Such atrial abnormalities have been shown to be commonly associated with cavity enlargement and poor compliance. The latter observation has similarly been reported in patients with reduced EF.  Despite the above similarities in cardiac physiology between HFpEF and HFrEF, treatments of the two conditions differ markedly. When comparing HFrEF and HFpEF, we can easily see that some patients fall into the grey area on the EF spectrum with values fluctuating above and below 40%, suggesting that the substrate for the expected drug effect may differ, possibly explaining the lack of consistent response in these patients.. In addition, it should not be forgotten that most heart failure medications work on the circulation rather than the heart itself, hence the need for shared circulatory disturbances between the two conditions before we can reasonably expect identical treatment benefits when using the same medications in different clinical settings.  Therefore, it is clear that classifying heart failure patients according to a single measure of LV function i.e. ejection fraction fails to help at least 50% of patients presenting with this syndrome. In contrast, aggregating such patients based on clear evidence for raised LA pressures, irrespective of EF, might show evidence for a more consistent response to vasodilators and conventional heart failure therapy, particularly those patients currently described as HFpEF. 


Keywords


Cardiology; Heart Failure; HFpEF; HFmrEF; Haemodynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:426-40.

Henein MY, Amadi A, O'Sullivan C, Coats A, Gibson DG. ACE inhibitors unmask incoordinate diastolic wall motion in restrictive left ventricular disease. Heart 1996;76:326-31.

Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:165-93. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep007.

Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:1321-1360. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew082

Luscher TF. Risk factors for chronic heart failure: obesity, renal dysfunction, arteriovenous fistulas, and amyloid deposition. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1857-1860. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx323

Liu PP, Smyth D. Wild-Type Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Missed Cause of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction With Evolving Treatment Implications. Circulation 2016;133:245-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 115.020351.

Buggey J, Alenezi F, Yoon HJ et al. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: outcomes following an acute heart failure hospitalization. ESC Heart Fail 2017;4:432-439. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12159.

Henein M, Morner S, Lindmark K, Lindqvist P. Impaired left ventricular systolic function reserve limits cardiac output and exercise capacity in HFpEF patients due to systemic hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:1088-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.11.035.

Solomon SD, Biering-Sorensen T. LA Strain When Ejection Fraction Is Preserved: A New Measure of Diastolic Function? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:744-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09. 018.

Tossavainen E, Henein MY, Gronlund C, Lindqvist P. Left Atrial Intrinsic Strain Rate Correcting for Pulmonary Wedge Pressure Is Accurate in Estimating Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Breathless Patients. Echocardiography 2016;33:1156-65. doi: 10.1111/echo.13226.

Henein M, Zhao Y, Henein MY, Lindqvist P. Disturbed left atrial mechanical function in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a speckle tracking study. Int J Cardiol 2012;155:437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.007.

Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Assmann SF et al. Regional variation in patients and outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial. Circulation 2015;131:34-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 114.013255.

Khan MS, Fonarow GC, Khan H et al. Renin-angiotensin blockade in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail 2017;4:402-408. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12204.

Menet A, Greffe L, Ennezat PV et al. Is mechanical dyssynchrony a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? Am Heart J 2014;168:909-16 e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.004

Hsu JJ, Ziaeian B, Fonarow GC. Heart Failure With Mid-Range (Borderline) Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Future Directions. JACC Heart Fail 2017;5:763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.013.

Shewan LG, Coats AJS, Henein M. Requirements for ethical publishing in biomedical journals. International Cardiovascular Forum Journal 2015;2:2, DOI: 10.17987/icfj.v2i1.4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17987/icfj.v12i0.480

Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.